A North Dakota judge has denied a request to stop the enforcement of the state’s ban on new gender-transitioning procedures for minors.
A group of plaintiffs is challenging a 2023 law that criminalizes medical professionals for performing certain gender-transition procedures on minors. The case, T.D. v Drew H. Wrigley, sought a preliminary injunction to pause the law’s enforcement until its legality is determined.
Judge Jackson Lofgren ruled on June 5 that the plaintiffs did not meet the burden of proof for a preliminary injunction, allowing North Dakota to continue enforcing the law.
The plaintiffs include three families with transgender children and Dr. Luis Casas, a licensed pediatric endocrinologist in North Dakota. They are represented by legal firms Ciresi Conlin LLP, The Lawyering Project, and Gender Justice.
The complaint argues that the 2023 law violates the rights of transgender children, parents, and medical professionals. The defendants named in the case include North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley.
According to Judge Lofgren, the plaintiffs did not show a likelihood of success on their claims.
The 2023 law does have exceptions for certain medical cases, but the complaint argues that the wording of these exceptions is vague and could lead to legal risks for healthcare providers.
Responding to the ruling, Gender Justice expressed concerns about the impact of the law on transgender youth in North Dakota.
Despite the ruling, Gender Justice remains committed to challenging the law and believes it should be overturned.
Several other states have also passed laws restricting gender-transition procedures for minors, with ongoing legal challenges in many cases.
Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin and Kansas have attempted to ban gender-transition procedures for minors, facing opposition from Democratic governors.
From NTD News
Can you please rewrite this for me?
Source link
