The Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition are challenging the constitutionality of the ban on carrying guns in U.S. Post Offices following the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision. The lawsuit, filed against U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, argues that the federal laws prohibiting firearms in post offices are unconstitutional under the standards set by the Bruen decision, which requires consideration of the text and historical context of firearms regulation.
Plaintiffs Gavin Pate and George Mandry, Texas residents and members of FPC and SAF, are required to disarm when visiting post offices despite holding Texas-issued firearms licenses. The lawsuit contends that these laws violate Second Amendment rights and predicts that they will be struck down in light of the Bruen decision.
The Department of Justice, American Postal Workers Union, and U.S. Postal Service declined to comment on the lawsuit. This legal challenge follows a previous ruling in Florida where a federal judge found the ban on firearms in post offices to be a violation of Second Amendment rights. The latest lawsuit takes aim at both federal laws prohibiting firearms in post offices, arguing for the protection of individuals’ rights to possess and carry firearms for lawful purposes. Please rewrite this sentence so that it has a different structure.
Source link
