Regardless of the outcome in November, relations between the United States and China are expected to remain tense, with differences becoming more apparent.
Commentary
While Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have significant differences, they share similarities in their approach to China trade and investment. Both are likely to maintain a confrontational stance towards China, although their tactics may vary.
Trump has been known for his tough stance on China, implementing tariffs and demanding policy changes. He has made it clear that he plans to continue this approach if re-elected.
Harris, on the other hand, is expected to follow President Joe Biden’s policies. Although she may choose a different approach, her limited experience in foreign affairs and economics suggests that she will likely continue Biden’s stance. Biden, despite criticizing Trump, has also maintained a tough stance on China.
Looking back at recent history, Trump’s administration was marked by hostility towards China, particularly in terms of trade. He imposed tariffs on Chinese imports and tightened controls on technology sales to China. Despite reaching agreements with Beijing, little progress was made.
The Biden administration has continued Trump’s tariffs and taken additional steps to pressure Beijing. These actions include restricting the sale of advanced technology to China and forbidding American investment in Chinese technology.
As the election approaches, both Trump and Harris are expected to maintain a tough stance on China. Trump has proposed further tariffs and a technology de-coupling with China, while Harris has shown support for multilateral approaches and global infrastructure projects to counter China’s influence.
While their tactics may differ, both candidates share a suspicion of Beijing and opposition to China’s trade practices. With bipartisan hostility towards China trade and investment in Congress, it appears that the relationship between the US and China will remain contentious regardless of the election outcome.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Can you please rewrite this sentence?
Source link
