The Cass report has recommended a halt on the use of puberty-blocking drugs until more information is available. However, the question arises – how can this knowledge be obtained through ethical means?
In the midst of this debate, it is evident that the Cass report, led by Dr. Hilary Cass, a respected pediatrician, highlighted the lack of substantial evidence supporting the treatments for transgender children and adolescents. The report raises concerns about the recent surge in cases and questions the underlying reasons behind it – whether it is a result of societal influences or a genuine medical condition.
The ethical dilemma lies in the uncertainty surrounding the long-term effects of these treatments on individuals and society as a whole. The report urges caution in administering drugs to pre-pubertal children without a clear understanding of the consequences. It emphasizes the need for ethical considerations in conducting research and treatment for this vulnerable population.
The current situation calls for a balanced approach that prioritizes the well-being of children while also upholding ethical standards in medical practice. As the debate continues, it is crucial to navigate these complex issues with sensitivity and caution to ensure the best possible outcomes for all involved.
Ollier conducted his experiments on rabbits, not on children. Additionally, the evident suffering of his human patients, as depicted in the photographs of those he treated and assisted, justified the experimentation on them. Since bone-grafting was initially experimental, it was deemed necessary. Ollier’s motivation was rooted in common humanity rather than ideology.
The significant rise in the number of children identifying as transgender, along with the administration of drugs with uncertain long-term effects, can only be attributed to the sudden influence of ideology. Furthermore, the individuals influenced by this ideology were educated and intelligent, highlighting how education and intelligence do not safeguard against the propagation of trendy foolishness. In fact, they may even contribute to it by enabling rationalization of such behaviors.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
