The recent debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump was not as significant as previous debates and was marred by biased moderation.
Sign up for Free Media from Reason and Robby Soave for more on free speech, social media, and media criticism.
In contrast to previous debates, the moderation in this debate was heavily one-sided and unfair. While Trump was fact-checked multiple times, Harris was not held to the same standard. The debate also featured biased questioning, with Trump facing tough questions while Harris avoided scrutiny on important issues.
Trump’s claims about Haitian migrants eating pets in Springfield, Ohio were debunked by fact-checkers, highlighting the need for accurate information in debates. However, some wild claims about Harris supporting gender-affirming care for detained illegal immigrants turned out to be true, showing the complexity of fact-checking in political debates.
Future debates should aim for balanced moderation and fair treatment of all candidates to ensure a more informative and productive discussion.
The magazine was forced to issue a correction, highlighting the need for a fact-check of their own. Amber Duke and I delve into discussions about Harris’ policies, the ongoing feud with Elon Musk, Bernie Sanders’ acknowledgment of Kamala’s inconsistencies, and the Democratic Party’s embrace of the Cheney family. On a different note, I failed to mention my recent viewing of “Wolverine and Deadpool,” which I thoroughly enjoyed. Despite the MCU’s recent missteps post-“Avengers: Endgame,” this film reignited my excitement for what lies ahead. It skillfully incorporated elements from the “Loki” series on Disney+, such as the Time Variance Authority and the Void, where displaced heroes reside.
Source link