The only scheduled vice presidential debate between Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is set to take place on Oct 1. Many anticipate a lively exchange between these seasoned debaters. The banter between the two started even before the debate was officially scheduled, with Walz challenging Vance to get off the couch and face him in a debate.
After CBS confirmed the date for the debate on August 14, Walz confirmed his participation on social media, while Vance, in a bid to goad Walz into a second debate, accepted not only the CBS debate but also proposed a CNN debate on September 18. Despite Vance’s suggestion, Walz declined a second meeting.
To evaluate the debate skills of these candidates, The Epoch Times observed their past debates and consulted experts on rhetoric and political communication. Both Vance and Walz are effective communicators with a strong command of information and sharp rhetorical abilities. They are capable of being polite but can also launch vigorous attacks when challenged.
The article then delves into five key aspects of political debate where Vance and Walz differ, such as their presentation styles, reasoning skills, and how they handle tough questions from moderators. Additionally, it highlights their strategies and approaches during previous debates, shedding light on their strengths and weaknesses as debaters. He failed to address future plans, which was the main focus of the question.
Vance is known for evading tough questions by briefly answering them before shifting the conversation to a topic that puts his opponent in a difficult position.
During a debate on the use of funds from the IRA, Vance acknowledged that some money was well spent before segueing into discussions on wasteful spending, federal borrowing, energy policy, and grocery prices, ultimately criticizing his opponent’s voting record.
It is anticipated that Walz will deflect challenging questions by highlighting achievements in a different area, while Vance is expected to provide a short response before launching an attack.
Walz’s speaking style has evolved over the years, becoming more aggressive and combative in recent debates, according to Schultz. In a debate on addressing the opioid crisis, Walz accused his opponent, a physician, of contributing to the problem by prescribing opioids at a higher rate than his peers.
Vance is also known for engaging in aggressive attacks against his opponents. In a senatorial debate, he vehemently refuted accusations made by his opponent, which he claimed had led to the harassment of his biracial children.
The upcoming debate between Walz and Vance is anticipated to be contentious, with both candidates likely to criticize each other passionately.
Experts suggest that winning a vice presidential debate is challenging, as the candidates are more likely to hurt their ticket than help it. Avoiding mistakes and blunders is crucial for a successful debate performance.
Vance’s tendency to display anger and disdain towards his opponent could be a weakness in the debate, according to Jellison. On the other hand, Walz’s reliance on storytelling and examples may lead to confusion among listeners if not managed carefully.
The experts are divided on who will emerge victorious in the debate, but they agree that the outcome may not have a significant impact. The debate is scheduled to take place in New York on Oct. 1 at 9 p.m. Eastern time. Please rephrase.
Source link
