policy in Ukraine under a Harris presidency are clear,” Kessler said. “It would subject the world to a period of great instability and could potentially lead to a direct conflict between major global powers.”
Where Harris and Trump Stand on Ukraine
The global support for Ukraine has the potential to increase volatility in the international system, impacting various areas such as the global economy, shipping, supply chain security, and manufacturing. Former President Trump’s approach to the conflict in Ukraine was heavily influenced by the threat of Russia’s nuclear arsenal, the largest in the world.
During the presidential debate, Trump criticized the Biden administration for not taking Russia’s nuclear capabilities seriously and expressed concern about the possibility of a nuclear war initiated by Russia. He emphasized the importance of negotiating with Russia to end the war in Ukraine, highlighting his willingness to bring both sides to the table.
Trump believed that ending the conflict in Ukraine quickly was essential for the United States to focus on its competition with communist China. His policies aimed to strengthen U.S. deterrent capabilities and energy dominance to maintain global order. However, navigating the complexities of global conflicts, particularly involving Russia, China, and Iran, could present challenges for a second Trump administration.
The negotiations for Ukraine’s future may require establishing new diplomatic norms rather than relying on proxy wars. The interconnected nature of conflicts worldwide could complicate the peace process. The key issue lies in whether Russia can move away from its dependence on China and embrace peaceful relations with the West.
Overall, a Trump presidency may face obstacles in resolving the conflict in Ukraine, as finding a quick peace may prove challenging. The focus will be on creating sustainable diplomatic solutions and potentially shifting Russia towards peaceful resolutions with the West. Could you please rephrase that?
Source link