Commentary
People tend to seek the quickest and easiest solutions to their problems. When faced with headaches, many opt for a pill instead of investigating the underlying cause. While taking a pill for immediate relief is not inherently wrong, persistent symptoms require a deeper exploration of the root issue.
Further legal cases, such as Ingram v. Alberta, have underscored how courts have interpreted the Alberta Bill of Rights in ways that do not offer substantial protection to citizens. This trend raises concerns about the efficacy of legal safeguards in upholding individual freedoms.
Moreover, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has also faced criticism for failing to prevent violations of citizens’ rights. Judges have sanctioned measures like lockdowns and vaccine mandates under Section 1 of the Charter, often without thorough scrutiny of the government’s justifications. This pattern has eroded trust in the legal system’s ability to safeguard fundamental rights.
Given these challenges, the Alberta government introduced Bill 24 to amend the Bill of Rights, aiming to enhance the protection of freedoms based on evidence and proportionality. This legislative effort reflects a recognition of the shortcomings in existing legal frameworks and seeks to address them.
In conclusion, the quest for justice and protection of rights is an ongoing journey that requires a comprehensive approach beyond mere legislative amendments. It necessitates a vigilant and discerning judiciary that upholds the spirit of the law and prioritizes the well-being of individuals over bureaucratic convenience.
Occasional headaches can be managed with a pill, but daily or frequent headaches may have an underlying cause that needs to be addressed.
Ultimately, the protection of a free society does not solely rely on legal documents like the Charter or the Alberta Bill of Rights. It is upheld by virtuous citizens who hold freedom dear in their hearts and minds.
In the 2020s, Canada is far from this ideal. The widespread acceptance of unscientific lockdown measures and the willingness of judges to prioritize media reports over evidence in Charter rights cases indicate a lack of value placed on fundamental freedoms.
The solution lies in creating a society where freedom and virtue are cherished by all. Making small improvements to our laws can help us progress towards this goal.
(Note: This article reflects the opinions of the author and may not represent the views of The Epoch Times.)
Source link
