The potential ban on TikTok by Congress may lead to a change in ownership or an outright ban, which could soon become law. However, I believe the Supreme Court will ultimately find it unconstitutional, as it would infringe on the First Amendment rights of the millions of Americans who use TikTok to express themselves.
Furthermore, I predict that the Court will rule that the forced sale violates the Fifth Amendment, which protects against the government seizing property without due process. This means that American TikTok users, who are part of the ownership, have the right to challenge the government’s actions in court.
There is also the argument that forcing the sale of a specific company, like TikTok, could be considered a bill of attainder, which is unconstitutional. Several federal courts have already rejected attempts to ban TikTok, citing these constitutional concerns.
Beyond the legal implications, there is a danger that this move against TikTok could set a precedent for the government to force the sale of other companies, such as Apple. The similarity in actions between Apple and TikTok in complying with foreign laws raises questions about the broader implications of such legislation.
The potential impact on other companies, like Temu and Springer Nature, raises concerns about the repercussions of targeting international businesses that operate in China. Rushing into isolationist policies without considering the broader consequences could have negative effects on trade and diplomatic relations.
While acknowledging the atrocities committed by Communist China, it is essential to approach international relations with caution and foresight. The push towards isolationism may have severe consequences, including economic repercussions and potential conflicts.
Despite my criticisms of Communist China, I believe that a measured approach to international trade is necessary to avoid further tensions and conflicts. It is crucial for Congress to consider the long-term implications of their actions and prioritize diplomacy over hasty decisions.