Commentary
The passing of Rex Murphy at 77 is a loss felt deeply in Canadian public life. His absence leaves a void that diminishes us all.
Rex, often referred to by his first name alone, was recognizable for his untamed hair and sharp humor. He was a prominent figure for those involved in politics and societal discourse, particularly for a generation of a certain age. While younger individuals may view him as a traditionalist National Post commentator critical of modern social trends, he was once a cornerstone of Canadian media, spending a significant portion of his career at the CBC, where he hosted “Cross Country Checkup” on CBC Radio One for 21 years during a time when the CBC held a revered status.
Murphy stood out in any setting, with his disheveled appearance, unconventional style, and down-to-earth Newfoundland charm and accent. He challenged political correctness long before it became a mainstream concern and continued to do so, defending common sense and ridiculing nonsense with sharp, often humorous clarity. Surprisingly, Murphy was also a Rhodes Scholar, a fact that may come as a surprise to many who knew him primarily for his commentary.
At times, he delved into politics, though success eluded him for obvious reasons. Murphy made unsuccessful political bids for both the Tories and the Liberals, and in the CBC’s Greatest Canadian contest, he supported Pierre Trudeau. He could have echoed G.K. Chesterton in saying that he didn’t abandon his party; rather, it abandoned him. In many respects, Murphy embodied the ideals of a classical liberal with a down-to-earth approach, valuing knowledge, meaningful discourse, and respectful interactions, even with those whose ideas he had just dissected with cutting wit.
While mortality is an inevitable part of life, Murphy’s passing at 77 due to cancer leaves a significant void, not just due to his departure after a long life. A vibrant culture loses influential figures daily, yet it nurtures new voices to carry on their legacy. Unfortunately, our current cultural climate seems too frail to cultivate individuals of Murphy’s caliber.
Such remarks are shallow. A commentator whose work never draws criticism would be ineffective, while one who never deserves criticism would be exceptionally fortunate or devoid of humanity. It’s not uncommon for public figures to earn income through speaking engagements. Murphy might suggest that the real issue lies with CBC executives benefiting from bonuses while the institution struggles with declining viewership.
Furthermore, the underlying grievance in such critiques is often directed towards industries like oil, which are integral to Canada’s economy yet vilified by certain circles for their alleged role in climate change. Dissent is no longer tolerated in mainstream Canadian discourse, nor is there room for respectful debate with intellectual adversaries.
Losing a figure like Rex Murphy under any circumstances would be saddening. Yet, losing the unique role he played in our national dialogue is truly tragic.
Rest in peace, Rex. You will be dearly missed.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Please rewrite the following sentence for me.
Source link
