Legal analysts are considering a range of outcomes in the high-profile trial of Donald J. Trump, from a guilty verdict to a hung jury to a complete acquittal. The trial has sparked polarized opinions among observers, with some experts suggesting a conviction is probable due to the political nature of the case, while others mention the potential for a hung jury or even an acquittal. The coverage of the trial in the media has also been noted for its politicization, shaping public perceptions of the case. Despite differing perspectives among legal experts, the jury composition and media coverage are seen as influential factors in the ultimate outcome of the trial.
Reclassifying Cohen’s legal expenses as a felony, they argue, delves into semantics and sophistry without any legal precedent.
Mark Graber, a professor at Francis King Carey School of Law in Maryland, acknowledges some blame on President Trump but suggests potential outcomes beyond a felony conviction.
“A hung jury is a possibility in a high-stakes criminal trial,” Mr. Graber told The Epoch Times.
John Feehery, a political strategist and former aide to Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), believes President Trump still has a chance to be acquitted.
“I estimate a 60 percent chance of acquittal, 20 percent for conviction, and 20 percent for a hung jury. The case is weak. I’d be surprised if he isn’t acquitted,” Mr. Feehery stated to The Epoch Times.
The District Attorney Bragg’s office has not responded to a request for comment.
