Commentary
In the movie “Equilibrium” (2002), all windows in the totalitarian state had been covered with a dingy film that prevented people from seeing any views of the sunrise, sunset, or anything else. A mandated medicine had been imposed universally to block out all feelings of emotion.
The hero in the film stops taking his meds and gradually feels the need to discover the truth of the situation. He works with the underground to overthrow the despots.
In a key scene, the leading character scratches away the film on the window and observes the outdoors. It’s raining and the window seems to be crying even as he cries as well, feeling genuine emotion that had been banned as policy. He felt a peculiar mix of sadness and also elation about what might be possible if he set his mind to it.
That scene keeps coming back to me as I’ve observed the feeling in the air in this remarkable and truly historic moment in the life of this wonderful country. The divisions and discontent on all sides have intensified without relief for as long as I can remember, particularly since Sept. 11, 2001. The surveillance state grew ever more intrusive and the power of the bureaucracy ascended even as politics itself seemed to stop working as a method of change.
Bureaucratic management necessarily divides the population because of its machine-like and institutionalized indifference to the contingencies of human experience. Some is necessary in every organization but too much cages people in prisons of the system, imposing on them edicts that make no real sense and have no feel for freedom of the human spirit. They can become soul crushing.
Related Stories
Bureaucracies, backed by the ambitions of a weaponized expert class, grew without limit, attempted even full mastery of the microbial kingdom, through coercive methods and experimental shots, as well as the goal of stabilizing the temperature of the whole planet earth through the regulation of our private lives.
What’s called “woke” ideology took overlordism to new levels of absurdity, dividing the population into ever more obscure buckets of idiosyncratic identity politics. Everyone was being drafted into camps of friends and enemies. The coalescing of official victim classes was consolidating ever more power, even within the military, and setting itself against visible targets of anyone who wanted to live what used to be called normal life.
Historians will surely look back at these years in shock, perhaps as we look at the last days of Rome or the French monarchy before the revolution. They will wonder how and why all this insanity was allowed to go on so long and be perpetrated by so many in elite classes.
For many years, I’ve asked myself the same question. We know how the Soviet empire came to be unraveled and the form that upheaval took in different countries in 1989–90. What we’ve not known is what form a similar unraveling might take in a Western industrial democracy. Before this past Tuesday, election evening, I had no answer to that other than by reference to the relentless decline of the empire of Spain from the late Middle Ages to the 19th century. That’s a depressing historical analogy.
Now we are presented with a different scenario, a far more hopeful one. It appears that the Founders’ system of stopping revolution through the ballot box has worked. Millions of people got themselves registered to vote, tossed aside doubts and cynicism about the system, and went out there and made their preferences known.
The results utterly confounded every prediction by the experts. The media was wrong. The polls were wrong. The experts were wrong.
Donald J. Trump is the beneficiary of the biggest landslide in modern times, his party capturing not only the presidency but sweeping in both houses of Congress, plus winning the popular vote. He won every “swing state,” re-enfranchised young men, broke through all racial and ethnic barriers, and achieved the seemingly impossible of giving back Americans a sense of hope for the future.
You have surely noticed over this past week the difference it has made. It’s not that everyone who voted Republican agrees with every policy or every priority. There is a great deal of diversity within the winning coalition. What matters is that the revolution is endogenous to the social order itself, achieved through the very methods established by the Founding Fathers (we can even say that phrase now).
The feeling of elation that is in evidence in all corners of American society is palpable. You see it on the streets. You feel it in conversation. The stock market obviously loves it but so do consumers. Over the weekend, I observed lots of celebratory shopping as people have gone out to prepare for a brighter future.
Politically, the closest analogy in American history is the election of 1800 that swept Thomas Jefferson into power against the centralists, snoops, and industrialists under John Adams who had tried to consolidate control. It was a populist revolution that secured America as the land of liberty for a very long time, and made the point that the Bill of Rights was as much a governing document as the Constitution itself.
But there is one major difference. This election was settled by the House of Representatives because the vote was tied. In the election of 2024, there is zero doubt about the outcome and great public awareness of what it all means.
I see some evidence that even some intellectuals are rethinking, having been shocked out of their bubbles and feeling the need to understand what just happened. Clearly, it is not the case, as we heard in the last week of the campaign, that Trump supporters are garbage people who support Orange Hitler or whatever they said.
It appears that there are other developments taking place.
Many have noted that class dynamics have had a significant impact on American politics, surpassing ideology. With social mobility stagnating for the majority and wealth accumulating at the top, the potential for a revolt became increasingly evident. However, the possibility of real change seemed uncertain. There was a concern that this election, like previous ones, would be manipulated by insiders to maintain the status quo.
Here are five key takeaways from the election results and their impact on public sentiment:
1. Realizing you are not alone: The county map of the country, dominated by red with a few blue pockets, indicates a widespread discontent that was not accurately portrayed in the media. If you have questioned policies in recent years, you are part of a significant majority that has not been adequately represented.
2. Recognizing the minority status of our rulers: The elites in media, corporate leadership, government, NGOs, and academia have traditionally held power, but the recent events have shown that public support is essential for a sustainable government. The balance of power is shifting.
3. Believing in a better future: The prospect of improvement has been elusive for many Americans, especially the middle class. With promises of change in various areas, there is renewed hope for economic growth and personal freedoms.
4. Expecting significant changes: The incoming administration is focused on addressing censorship, bureaucracy, immigration, globalism, and corruption. These efforts are aimed at restoring individual liberties and reducing government interference.
5. Embracing a new era of freedom: Discussions about reducing taxes, decentralizing finance, supporting domestic production, and promoting patriotism signal a shift towards greater personal autonomy and national pride.
These developments bring to mind the timeless words of the Declaration of Independence, emphasizing the importance of government serving the people’s interests.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s opinions and may not reflect those of The Epoch Times.
Source link
