One X user made a bold statement in a viral post on November 6th, urging women to stop dating and having sex with men, drawing inspiration from feminists in South Korea. Another popular post suggests that women in America should consider the 4B movement, similar to their South Korean counterparts, to combat the sharp decline in birth rates and stand up against men.
The idea of a sex strike as a form of protest against Donald Trump’s victory in the 2020 election has been circulating online. However, there is no evidence to suggest that such a movement is taking place or gaining traction.
The 4B movement in South Korea advocates for women to refrain from dating, marrying, having sex with men, and having children. This movement originated as a response to gender inequality and misogyny prevalent in South Korean society. Despite progress, South Korean men still exhibit strong opposition to feminism, contributing to significant gender disparities.
In South Korea, women face challenges in marriage and parenthood, with a substantial gender pay gap and unequal distribution of household chores. While some in the US have entertained the idea of a sex strike, it is unlikely to gain widespread support due to various factors, including the relatively smaller gender gap in American politics.
Media coverage of the sex strike theory reflects concerns over women’s rights and autonomy under a potential Trump administration. However, the practicality and feasibility of such a movement remain questionable, especially considering the diversity of opinions among women voters.
Rather than a realistic political strategy, the notion of a sex strike appears more symbolic in nature, highlighting frustrations and fears within certain segments of the female population. It serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between gender, politics, and activism in contemporary society.