The Federal Election Commission recently issued an advisory opinion allowing candidates to raise unlimited funds for issue-advocacy groups working on ballot measures in elections where the candidates are on the ballot.
This decision, in response to a request from a Nevada-based abortion rights group, could have a significant impact on the fundraising capacity of candidates aligned with these groups.
While the ruling applies to all federal candidates, it will particularly affect the upcoming presidential election. If Mr. Biden can raise money for abortion-rights ballot measures, it could further enhance his fundraising advantage over Mr. Trump.
The advisory opinion could also influence voter turnout in battleground states like Nevada and Arizona, where abortion rights groups are actively working on ballot measures.
The ruling allows both Mr. Biden and former President Donald J. Trump to solicit donations for outside groups advocating for ballot measures. With the potential focus on abortion-related measures following the repeal of Roe v. Wade, this change in campaign finance regulations is seen as significant.
The opinion, issued in response to a query from Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom, received support from a bipartisan group of commissioners on the F.E.C.
This decision opens up new opportunities for candidates to support outside groups without restrictions on funding sources or amounts. The National Republican Senatorial Committee raised concerns about potential coordination between candidates and outside groups, particularly in Nevada.
The F.E.C. ruling was supported by three Republicans and one Democrat on the commission. The decision could have far-reaching implications on campaign strategies and fundraising efforts.
While the Biden campaign and the Democratic National Committee declined to comment, the Republican National Committee faced changes in leadership following the advisory opinion.
Overall, the decision is expected to impact campaign finance regulations and super PAC capabilities, influencing the dynamics of future elections.
