Martin Durkin highlighted that climate skepticism can hinder a scientist’s career, leading him to interview older scientists for his film. According to Durkin, there is no scientific basis for climate alarm, despite the prevailing narrative. He emphasized that the science does not support the hysteria surrounding climate change. Younger scientists in academia are often reluctant to challenge the mainstream narrative for fear of jeopardizing their careers in the sciences. In his latest movie, Durkin interviewed prominent physicists, including Nobel Prize winner John Clauser, who disputed the human-and-CO2-driven global warming thesis.
Durkin summarized the arguments presented in the film, stating that there has not been an increase in hurricanes or wildfires. He pointed out that compared to the last 550 million years, the current period is unusually cold, with low levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. Despite industry emissions, CO2 is just one of many greenhouse gases that form a small part of Earth’s climate system.
Despite mounting evidence against man-made climate change, Durkin found it challenging to interview younger scientists who were still active in their careers. One scientist, earth scientist Matthew Wielicki, had been sidelined for his views. Furthermore, Durkin recalled how two astrophysicists, Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas, were prevented from speaking with him 17 years ago due to potential career repercussions.
Durkin released his film on social media platforms for free, as mainstream broadcasters were unwilling to air it. He criticized the mainstream media for uncritically accepting the climate crisis narrative, attributing it to either ideological bias or fear of criticism. Durkin questioned the lack of diversity in media coverage and criticized environmental journalists for not critically examining the climate change narrative.
He also addressed the increasing trend of media outlets committing to climate storytelling, raising concerns about impartiality and the suppression of alternative viewpoints. Durkin argued that environmentalism is often intertwined with anti-capitalism and the expansion of the state. He noted that people’s support for climate theories is often based on political allegiance rather than scientific understanding.
In conclusion, Durkin’s film challenges the mainstream narrative on climate change and highlights the challenges faced by scientists who question the prevailing views in academia.
Please rewrite this sentence.
Source link
