Commentary
The recent assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh by the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad in Tehran is a clear signal of potential escalation in conflicts involving Israel’s adversaries.
Israel has a history of responding to terrorist threats by targeting the leaders responsible, as seen in actions like Operation Defensive Shield under Ariel Sharon. This approach has often led to a cessation of attacks. Similarly, figures like Osama bin Laden, despite professing a willingness to die for their cause, have taken measures to avoid capture.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and its enemies has different levels of aggression, with responses varying based on the nature of the attacks. Acts of terrorism targeting Israeli civilians have often resulted in retaliatory actions aimed at the leaders of the responsible organizations.
Hamas, acting under Iranian influence, launched a violent incursion into Israel, signaling their refusal to accept Israel’s right to exist. Israel’s response was swift and targeted, leading to Haniyeh’s assassination.
Israel’s recent actions, including the assassination of Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr, indicate a proactive stance against threats from groups like Hezbollah. While tensions remain high, Israel has shown restraint in its responses, carefully avoiding all-out conflict.
Iran’s support for Hamas and Hezbollah has intensified regional tensions, with these groups following Iranian directives. The Arab states, acknowledging the changing dynamics, are increasingly open to normalizing relations with Israel if a resolution to the Palestinian issue can be reached.
Efforts by American presidents, including initiatives like the Abraham Accords, have played a significant role in improving Arab-Israeli relations. The long-standing Palestinian question, stemming from historical promises and territorial disputes, remains a key obstacle to lasting peace in the region.
Despite past rhetoric, Arab states are shifting towards recognizing Israel’s legitimacy and seeking diplomatic solutions. The potential normalization of relations with Saudi Arabia could further solidify this trend towards regional stability.
The October attack on Israel by Hamas is believed to be an Iranian attempt to prevent a peace agreement. The recent killing of the Hamas leader sends a clear message to Iran, supported by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s remarks to the U.S. Congress. Netanyahu hinted at the possibility of Israel taking action against the Iranian nuclear military program in defense of civilized states.
Despite propaganda, Israel’s campaign in Gaza has resulted in a low ratio of civilian-to-combatant deaths. Israel has eliminated a significant portion of Hamas terrorists and destroyed their underground operations. It is evident that Israel will continue to combat threats from Hamas and Iran.
Israel is prepared to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear military power, with or without assistance from other countries. Any escalation of hostilities will face Israeli air power and counter-terrorist measures. The actions of the Iranian regime may lead to internal unrest among the Iranian population.
Israel remains committed to defending its right to exist as a Jewish state and coexist peacefully with its neighbors. The assassination of Ismail Haniyeh was a positive step, emphasizing that no target of Israel’s retaliation is safe.
(Note: Views expressed in this article are the author’s opinions and may not reflect those of The Epoch Times.)
Source link
