County officials stated that further research is needed for some addresses.
Clark County Registrar of Voters Lorena Portillo conducted an investigation into the validity of 90 voter registration addresses in Nevada’s most populous county.
In a legal filing dated Aug. 15, attorneys representing Portillo mentioned that the Registrar of Voters (ROV) and her team scrutinized various commercial addresses provided by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) as part of a lawsuit filed on June 25 by two Nevada residents and PILF, urging the county to take action.
“The ROV exercised discretion in reviewing the addresses and will follow the necessary steps as mandated by federal and state laws,” stated the filing. Portillo clarified in the document that the investigation was not a legal requirement for her and her staff.
The county registrar confirmed that 29 of the commercial addresses were indeed the voter’s actual residence, 16 were previously marked as inactive voters, 12 had no active or inactive voters associated, nine were linked to voided registrations, four addresses were updated by voters, and one was a typographical error.
Furthermore, 19 addresses will need additional investigation by the Election Department, as per the filing.
The registrar did not respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
The addresses in question were flagged by PILF, who utilized computer analysis of voter rolls and physical visits to compile a list of commercial addresses.
PILF provided video evidence, photographs, personal interviews, and affidavits to support their findings.
Nevada law mandates election officials to conduct regular maintenance of voter rolls to ensure accuracy and currency.
As per a statement from PILF, Nevada law prohibits individuals from registering to vote at commercial addresses or post office boxes where they do not reside.
The group highlighted various types of addresses, including post office boxes, vacant lots, bars, state government offices, liquor stores, fast-food restaurants, convenience stores, parking lots, tattoo parlors, among others, that were referred to Clark County election officials for investigation.
“Clark County investigated all 90 commercial addresses we asked them to look into. We will be submitting a records request under the National Voter Registration Act to review the details, actions, and outcomes of the investigations,” said PILF communications director Lauren Bowman Bis in an email to The Epoch Times.
Following legal actions by the county, the lawsuit filed by PILF and the two residents was dismissed without prejudice by District Court Judge Timothy C. Williams in a court document dated Aug. 22.
According to data from the Nevada Secretary of State’s office, 95,556 ballots were sent to undeliverable addresses during the 2022 midterm election.
Washoe County Case
In a similar case, PILF and a Nevada resident filed a petition requesting the court to compel Washoe County election officials to investigate numerous voters registered at commercial addresses flagged by the foundation in that jurisdiction.
Washoe County spokesperson Bethany Drysdale refrained from commenting on the ongoing case but mentioned that Washoe County Interim Registrar of Voters Carrie-Ann Burgess is dedicated to maintaining accurate voter rolls.
Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar has aligned with Burgess in opposing the petition.
Aguilar did not respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
Additional entities opposing PILF’s petition included the Institute for Progressive Nevada, the Rise Action Fund, and the Nevada Alliance for Retired Americans.
PILF referred 48 voter registrations to Washoe election officials for investigation.
“It is a small, manageable, representative sample that could be quickly investigated if the will was there. If not, it is small enough to allow the court an easy, reasonable remedy,” Bis stated.
“Our objective is to use persuasion and, when necessary, litigation to urge local election officials to fulfill their statutory obligations by identifying and investigating potentially incorrect addresses and removing them from the voter roll.”
Bis informed The Epoch Times that PILF has been flagging potential issues with voter registrations at commercial properties to Nevada election officials since 2020.
Please rewrite the sentence.
Source link
