Itâs a given at this point that much pandemic-related fiscal stimulus was lost to fraud. The government flooded the world with money, we were told, to offset the disruption of economies paralyzed by people minimizing social contact and (especially) by mandated closures. Sure, that was a crude âsolutionâ to an avoidable problem. But government officials insist things would have been worse without stimulus.
Is that true, though, given that stimulus money not only padded the pockets of grifters but fueled the surging prices of recent years?
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.
Billions Recovered (of Hundreds of Billions Stolen)
âSince I established the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force three years ago, we have charged more than 3,500 defendants, seized or forfeited over $1.4 billion in stolen COVID-19 relief funds, and filed more than 400 civil lawsuits resulting in court judgments and settlements,â Attorney General Merrick Garland boasted earlier this month.
Of course, $1.4 billion is only a fraction of the trillions spent by the federal government to stimulate the economy. Then again, itâs also only a fraction of the stimulus money that was swiped by scam artists.
âThe total amount of fraud across all UI [unemployment insurance] programs (including the new emergency programs) during the COVID-19 pandemic was likely between $100 billion and $135 billionâor 11% to 15% of the total UI benefits paid out during the pandemic,â the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimated in September 2023.
That was after the Small Business Administrationâs Inspector General found more than $200 billion stolen from the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). That represented more than one-sixth of the money disbursed through the two programs.
âThe full extent of fraud associated with the COVID-19 relief funds will never be known with certainty,â the GAO conceded in a report last November.
Itâs nice the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task clawed back $1.4 billion. But thatâs chump change in the context of massive handouts of money.
Stimulating Not Just Con Artists, but Inflation Too
But if you think the trillions spent on pandemic stimulus was a high price to pay for that contented smile on your crooked neighborâs face, you can rest assured that the money bought something else: the rising cost of living relative to income. Thatâs because that flood of dollars fueled inflation.
âThe large increase in demand triggered by the fiscal stimulus policy, together with the slow pace of adjustment in production, likely contributed to the current imbalance in the goods market, resulting in the depletion of inventories, pronounced bottlenecks, and ultimately inflation,â admitted the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in July 2022.
âU.S. fiscal stimulus during the pandemic contributed to an increase in inflation of about 2.6 percentage points in the U.S.,â three economists with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis estimated last year. A big reason, they continued, is that the trillions intended to stimulate the economy were essentially created out of thin air, âborrowedâ from the future. âDebt issuance is inflationary when forward-looking agents believe that newly issued government debt is only partially backed by future taxes.â
This squares with what economists elsewhere have written about the effects of showering a vast supply of new money on the country.
âStarting in March 2020, in response to the disruptions of Covid-19, the U.S. government created about $3 trillion of new bank reserves, equivalent to cash, and sent checks to people and businesses,â John Cochrane of the Hoover Institution and the Cato Institute argued in a 2022 paper. âThe Treasury then borrowed another $2 trillion or so and sent more checks. Overall federal debt rose nearly 30 percent. Is it at all a surprise that a year later inflation breaks out?â
Even so, the Fed authors argue that âthe large spending supported a strong economic reboundâŠlikely preventing worse outcomes despite the price pressures that may have resulted from the spending.â
That assessment, though, is based on assumptions that the money was spent as intended to prop up legitimate businesses and keep worthy people working and spending. Itâs difficult to see that the calculus works the same wayâcertainly not, in moral termsâif hundreds of billions of dollars of that money was lost to fraudsters, leaving honest Americans to deal with the resulting eroded value of their paychecks and, ultimately, to pay off the soaring federal debt left behind by the stimulus.
Unhappy Americans Left Feeling the Pinch
Certainly, people arenât happy with the results. Americans have a negative, though improving, view of economic conditions, with 30 percent calling them âfairâ and 39 percent âpoor,â according to Gallup. âMore Americans still say they worry about inflation than any of 13 other issues rated,â the polling company noted at the end of March. In fact, Americans may be feeling more of a pinch than official numbers suggest.
Attempting to explain deep public dissatisfaction with the economy, economists Marijn Bolhuis, Judd Cramer, Karl Schulz, and Lawrence Summers recently calculated inflation using alternate measures. Under pre-1983 methodology that calculated housing costs differently, âheadline CPI would have peaked at 18 percent in November 2022â instead of at 9.1 percent in June 2022 under current methods.
They believe that this has greatly contributed to the prevailing sense of pessimism over the past couple of years.
It is possible that things could have been even worse without the distribution of stimulus checks. However, if we were to speculate about alternative scenarios, it might be more beneficial to envision a world where policymakers refrained from implementing lockdowns and stay-at-home orders that have crippled economies, thus eliminating the need for emergency funds handed out to anyone who requested them. They could have possibly prevented exacerbating the situation.
âWe are currently facing inflation driven by a deficit,â as noted by Cochrane last week. In order to avoid further aggravating an already disillusioned public, he suggests that the government should refrain from worsening the situation by canceling student loan debt and increasing the federal deficit.
This approach seems more constructive than occasional announcements boasting about recovering a small fraction of the funds lost to scammers out of the vast amounts distributed. However, it is unlikely that the politicians responsible for the current state of affairs will take such actions.
Source link