Crime Bills Divide California Democrat Lawmakers

Senator Seyarto reiterated his dissatisfaction with the inoperability clauses and made it clear that he would back the bills only if the amendments were excluded.

“Poison pills are being slipped into these bills in an effort to disrupt the legislative process and undermine the voters’ intentions,” stated Mr. Seyarto in a press release on June 13. “Playing political games with public safety is unacceptable.”

One bill in the public safety legislative package, Assembly Bill 1972 by Republican Assemblyman Juan Alanis aimed at combating cargo theft with a property crimes task force, was not subjected to the inoperability clause amendment.

Mr. Alanis had previously expressed reservations about the non-operative clause in a statement sent to The Epoch Times on June 7. “I am concerned about the potential new amendments and have raised my doubts. I have discussed my concerns with leaders from both parties, and I trust that they will be taken seriously.”

All six public safety bills were modified to include an urgency clause, which expedites their passage through the Legislature and enables them to become effective immediately upon the governor’s approval.

The urgency clauses garnered bipartisan backing, and the six bills are set to be reviewed by the Senate in the upcoming weeks.

Several public safety bills introduced by the Senate are scheduled for consideration by the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee on June 19, where additional inoperability and urgency clauses are anticipated, according to legislators.

Source link