Senator John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) strongly criticizes the notion of “squatter’s rights,” questioning the laws that allow individuals illegally occupying a property to claim ownership over the rightful owner. He describes this as simply “breaking the law.”
Squatter rights laws, also known as adverse possession laws, enable individuals unlawfully residing on someone else’s property to assert ownership if they are not evicted after a certain period. While these laws are in place in all 50 U.S. states, their enforcement varies significantly.
In an interview on April 6 with The New York Post, Senator Fetterman shared his extensive experience with these laws during his tenure as mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania. He highlighted instances where these laws could come into effect after just 30 days of illegal occupancy.
“It’s absurd that if you leave for a long trip and someone breaks into your home, they suddenly gain rights,” he remarked.
Related Stories
The concept of squatter’s rights as seen today can be traced back to the Homestead Act of 1862, which permitted settlers to claim land in the western United States on the condition that they improve and reside on it for at least five years. Over time, the scope of squatter’s rights has extended beyond land claims.
Senator Fetterman asserts that “Squatters have no rights” and during his tenure as Mayor, he consistently opposed such practices.
Border Patrol has encountered over 7.6 million illegal immigrants attempting to cross the border since President Joe Biden’s inauguration in January 2021. Many seek asylum, leading to resource strains in various jurisdictions, particularly in Texas, Arizona, and New York.
Fetterman Advocates for Smart and Aggressive Crime Policies
Blaming lenient crime policies for the tragic shooting of NYPD Detective Jonathan Diller during a recent traffic stop in Queens, Senator Fetterman emphasizes the need for accountability for repeat offenders.
While he supports giving second chances to individuals who make mistakes, he believes that repeated offenses should not go unpunished.
“If someone has a history of repeated offenses, it serves no purpose to allow them to continue without consequences,” he stated.
“If convicted, the individual should be sentenced to life in prison without parole,” he concluded.
Please rephrase.
Source link
