The image shows Kamala Harris and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz in connection to the deadly riots in Minneapolis and St. Paul in 2020. Their actions and inaction are criticized for allowing criminals to wreak havoc on the cities, resulting in the destruction of businesses and an increase in crime. Governor Walz was hesitant to mobilize the National Guard during the riots, leading to further chaos. Vice President Harris also received criticism for her support of the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which bailed out violent criminals. The aftermath of the riots left many small business owners devastated and feeling abandoned by the government. Paul Novotny, a retired cop and GOP leader of the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee, emphasized the importance of bail as guaranteed in the state constitution. He stated that bail is meant to ensure individuals show up for their court hearings and deter them from reoffending.
Novotny highlighted the issue of violent crimes without consequences, stating that without any accountability, there is no incentive for individuals not to reoffend. He raised concerns about the impact of bail on public safety, particularly in cases where dangerous criminals are bailed out.
The article mentioned specific cases where the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) posted bail for individuals charged with serious crimes, such as murder, rape, and assault. These actions by MFF have caused distress to victims and raised concerns about community safety.
Republican Minnesota state Rep. Mary Franson introduced the Bail Abatement Nonprofit Exclusion (BANE) act to prevent nonprofits like MFF from paying bail for criminal suspects. Despite her efforts, the bill did not progress due to opposition from MFF’s lobbying campaign.
Franson highlighted the increase in crime in the Twin Cities following the George Floyd riots and the decline in police presence. She expressed concerns about the safety of lawmakers even on the grounds of the state capitol in St. Paul.
Overall, the article underscores the impact of MFF’s actions on public safety in Minnesota and raises questions about the potential implications at a national level under a Harris-Walz administration.
Source link
