Steward Turner, PC Research Manager, clarified that market failure does not necessarily mean that the market outcome aligns with personal preferences. The Productivity Commission (PC) stated that high insurance premiums do not automatically indicate market failures, despite concerns raised by consumer groups about the affordability of home insurance.
During a recent Senate inquiry, Tyrone Shandiman from the Australian Consumers Insurance Lobby highlighted a perceived market failure in the home insurance sector, citing extreme cases of high premiums charged to consumers. However, PC Research Manager Steward Turner explained that while the insurance market may not be operating perfectly efficiently, high premiums in certain areas do not always signify market failures.
Turner emphasized that market failure refers to specific conditions such as monopoly or oligopoly, or a lack of competition due to market concentration. He pointed out that if premiums were unreasonably low in high-risk areas, it could indicate an inefficient insurance market, which would be considered a market failure.
The recent increase in home insurance prices was attributed to various factors, including natural disaster risks and property values. Turner mentioned that rising property values and construction costs contribute to higher insurance premiums, even if natural disaster risks decrease. To address the issue of escalating insurance premiums, Turner suggested establishing a social safety net and addressing the root causes of natural disaster risks.
Professor Paula Jarzabkowski from the University of Queensland echoed concerns about rising insurance unaffordability globally, noting that market self-correction may not be sufficient in Australia. She highlighted the weak link between risk mitigation and premium reduction, emphasizing that some mitigation measures are beyond the control of individuals. Jarzabkowski stressed that significant changes are needed to address the challenges posed by escalating insurance costs worldwide. Please rewrite this sentence.
Source link
