Hillary Clinton criticized her fellow Democrats over what she described as a decades-in-the-making failure to protect abortion rights, saying in her first extended interview about the fall of Roe v. Wade that her party underestimated the growing strength of anti-abortion forces until many Democrats were improbably âtaken by surpriseâ by the landmark Dobbs decision in 2022.
In wide-ranging and unusually frank comments, Mrs. Clinton said Democrats had spent decades in a state of denial that a right enshrined in American life for generations could fall â that faith in the courts and legal precedent had made politicians, voters and officials unable to see clearly how the anti-abortion movement was chipping away at abortion rights, restricting access to the procedure and transforming the Supreme Court, until it was too late.
âWe didnât take it seriously, and we didnât understand the threat,â Mrs. Clinton said. âMost Democrats, most Americans, did not realize we are in an existential struggle for the future of this country.â
She said: âWe could have done more to fight.â
Mrs. Clintonâs comments came in an interview conducted in late February for a forthcoming book, âThe Fall of Roe: The Rise of a New America.â
The interview represented Mrs. Clintonâs most detailed comments on abortion rights since the Supreme Court decision that led to the procedure becoming criminalized or restricted in 21 states. She said not only that her party was complacent but also that if she had been in the Senate at the time she would have worked harder to block confirmation of Trump-appointed justices.
And in a blunt reflection about the role sexism played in her 2016 presidential campaign, she said women were the voters who abandoned her in the final days because she was not âperfect.â Overhanging the interview was the understanding that had she won the White House, Roe most likely would have remained a bedrock feature of American life. She assigned blame for the fall of Roe broadly but pointedly, and notably spared herself from the critique.
Some Democrats will most likely agree with Mrs. Clintonâs assessment. But as the party turns its focus to wielding abortion as an electoral weapon, there has been little public reckoning among Democrats over their role in failing to protect abortion rights.
Even when they held control of Congress, Democrats were unwilling to pass legislation codifying abortion rights into federal law. While frequently mentioned in passing to rally their base during election season, the issue rarely rose to the top of their legislative or policy agenda. Many Democrats, including President Biden, often refused even to utter the word.
Until Roe fell, many in the party believed the federal right to an abortion was all but inviolable, unlikely to be reversed even by a conservative Supreme Court. The sense of denial extended to the highest ranks of the party â but not, Mrs. Clinton argued, to her.
âOne thing I give the right credit for is they never give up,â she said. âThey are relentless. You know, they take a loss, they get back up, they regroup, they raise more money.â She added: âItâs tremendously impressive the way that they operate. And we have nothing like it on our side.â
Mrs. Clinton did not express regret for any inaction herself. Rather, she said her efforts to raise alarms during her 2016 campaign went unheeded and were dismissed as âalarmistâ by voters, politicians and members of her own party. In that race, she had talked about the threats to abortion rights on the campaign trail and most memorably in the third presidential debate, vowing to protect Roe when Mr. Trump promised to appoint judges who would overturn it.
But even then, internal campaign polling and focus groups showed that the issue did not resonate strongly with key groups of voters, because they did not believe Roe was truly at risk.
Now, as the country prepares to face its third referendum on Mr. Trump, she offered a stark warning about the 2024 election. A second Trump administration would go far beyond abortion rights to target womenâs health care, gay rights, civil rights â and even the core tenets of American democracy itself, she said.
âThis election is existential. I mean, if we donât make the right decision in this election in our country, we may never have another actual election. I will put that out there because I believe it,â she said. âAnd if we no longer have another actual election, we will be governed by a small minority of right-wing forces that are well organized and well funded and are getting exactly what they want in terms of turning the clock back on women.â
Mrs. Clinton described those forces and her former opponent as part of âglobal phenomenaâ restricting womenâs rights, pointing to a push by Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, pressing women to focus on raising children; the violent policing of women who violate Iranâs conservative dress code; and what she described as the misogyny of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.
âAuthoritarians, whether they be political or religious based, always go after women. Itâs just written in the history. And thatâs what will happen in this country,â Mrs. Clinton said.
Mrs. Clinton viewed her remarks as another attempt to ring an alarm before the 2024 election.
âMore people have got to wake up, because this is the beginning,â she said. âThey really want us to just shut up and go home. Thatâs their goal. And nobody should be in any way deluded. Thatâs what they will force upon us if they are given the chance.â
But she also seemed to expect that many would dismiss her concerns once again. âOh, my God, there she goes again,â she said, describing what she anticipated would be the reaction to her interview. âI mean, sheâs just so, you know, so out there.â
But she added: âI know history will prove me right. And I donât take any comfort in that because thatâs not the kind of country or world I want for my grandchildren.â
Embodying the Roe era
Nearly eight years after her final campaign, Mrs. Clinton remains one of the most prominent women in American politics, and the only woman in the countryâs history to capture the presidential nomination of a major party.
Her life encapsulates what could be seen as the Roe era in American life. She embodies the professional and personal changes that swept the lives of American women over the past half-century. Roe was decided in 1973, the same year Mrs. Clinton graduated from law school. Its fall was accelerated in 2016 by her loss to Donald J. Trump, which set in motion a transformation of the Supreme Court.
Had Mrs. Clinton won the White House in 2016, history would have turned out very differently. She would most likely have appointed two or even three justices to the Supreme Court, securing an abortion-rights legal majority that probably would have not only upheld Roe but also delivered rulings that expanded access to the procedure.
Instead, Mrs. Clinton said Democrats neglected abortion rights from the ballot box to Congress to the Supreme Court.
Along with her prediction for the future, Mrs. Clinton offered a detailed assessment of the past. For her, the meaning of the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenâs Health Organization was clear â and devastating.
âIt says that we are not equal citizens,â she said, referring to women. âIt says that we donât have autonomy, agency and privacy to make the most personal of decisions. It says that we should be rethinking our lives and our roles in the world.â
She blasted Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who wrote the Supreme Courtâs majority opinion in the case, saying his decision was âterrible,â âpoorly reasonedâ and âhistorically inaccurate.â
Mrs. Clinton accused four justices â John G. Roberts Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett â of being âteed up to do the biddingâ of conservative political and religious organizations and leaders â though she believed many Democrats had not realized that during those justicesâ confirmation hearings.
âIt is really hard to believe that people are going to lie to you under oath, that even so-called conservative justices would upend precedents to arrive at ridiculous decisions on gun rights and campaign finance and abortion,â she said. âItâs really hard to accept that.â
Yet, she also had tough words for her former colleagues. In the Senate, she said, Democratic lawmakers did not push hard enough to block the confirmation of the justices who would go on to overturn federal abortion rights. When asked in confirmation hearings if they believed Roe was settled law, the nominees noted that Roe was precedent and largely avoided stating their opinion on the decision.
Those justices âall lied in their confirmation hearings,â she said, referring to Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett, all of whom were appointed by Mr. Trump. âThey just flat-out lied. And Democrats did nothing in the Senate.â
She added: âIf Iâd still been in the Senate, and on the Judiciary Committee, I think, you know, I hope I would have tried to do more about what were just outright prevarications.â
It is unclear how Democrats could have stopped those justices from reaching the bench given that they did not control the Senate during their confirmation hearings. When Mr. Trump took office, Republicans also had unified control of 24 state legislatures, making it all but impossible for Democrats to stop conservatives from pushing through increasingly restrictive laws.
For years, she said, Democrats failed to âinvest in the kind of parallel institutionsâ to the conservative legal establishment. Efforts to start the American Constitution Society, she said, never quite grew as large as the better established Federalist Society, a network of conservative lawyers, officials and justices that includes members of the Supreme Court.
âI just think that most of us who support the rights of women and privacy and the right to make these difficult decisions yourself, you know, we just couldnât believe what was happening. And as a result, they slowly, surely and very effectively got what they wanted,â she said. âOur side was complacent and kind of taking it for granted and thinking it would never go away.â
âAs a woman, Iâm supposed to be perfectâ
Mrs. Clinton was born in 1947, when abortion was criminalized and contraception was banned or restricted in more than two dozen states. In Arkansas, where she practiced law while her husband served as governor, she watched the rise of the religious right and the anti-abortion movement.
From the time she arrived in Washington as first lady, Mrs. Clinton fought openly for abortion rights. She famously declared that âhuman rights are womenâs rights, and womenâs rights are human rightsâ in a 1995 speech at the World Conference on Women in Beijing. When she became a senator, Mrs. Clinton voted against the partial-birth abortion ban, unlike more than a dozen of her fellow Democrats. As Barack Obamaâs secretary of state, she made a mission of expanding womenâs reproductive health across the globe.
In 2016, Planned Parenthood endorsed her candidacy, the first time the organization waded into a presidential primary. In her campaign, Mrs. Clinton promised to appoint judges who would preserve Roe, opposed efforts in Congress to pass a 20-week abortion ban and pushed for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment, which banned the federal funding of abortions.
Even her language was updated. For years, when it came to abortion, she championed her belief in a phrase popularized by her husband during his 1992 presidential campaign: âsafe, legal and rare.â
In a private, previously unreported meeting recounted in the book, campaign aides told Mrs. Clinton to drop the phrase during her 2016 run. Her staff explained that increasingly progressive abortion-rights activists thought calling for the procedure to be ârareâ would offer a political concession to the anti-abortion movement. And with so many new restrictions being passed in conservative-controlled states, abortion was increasingly difficult to obtain, particularly for poorer women, making ârareâ the wrong focus for their message. Abortion should be âsafe, legal, accessible and affordable,â they told her.
âWell, that doesnât make any sense,â she said in response at the time. âThatâs stupid.â
In the interview, Mrs. Clinton said she quickly came to embrace the shift in language. What she and other Democrats had tried to do in 1992 with âsafe, legal and rareâ was âsend a signal that we understand Roe v. Wade has a certain theory of the case about trimesters,â she explained. But by 2016, the world had changed.
âToo many women, particularly too many young women did not understand the effort that went into creating the underlying theory of Roe v. Wade. And the young women on my campaign made a very compelling argument that making it safe and legal was really the goal,â she said. âI kind of just pocketed the framework of Roe.â
Still, Mrs. Clinton felt like many of her warnings over the issue were ignored by much of the country.
Source link