Commentary
The federal government’s immigration policy, which includes increasing the number of newcomers to 500,000 per year, has faced significant criticism recently. The impact of the influx of newcomers on the already tight housing and rental market has been a recurring issue.
One of the major concerns regarding Canada’s refugee and citizenship system revolves around national security and public safety. The situation has been exacerbated by recent revelations of alleged terrorist plots linked to the ISIS group being planned within Canada.
The elder Eldidi managed to obtain refugee, landed immigrant, and citizenship status despite being featured in an ISIS propaganda video where he dismembers a prisoner, dating back to 2015. Despite various “red flags” and warning signs, he was still granted the aforementioned privileges.
- The pressure to accommodate a high number of newcomers may have led some departments to advise security screeners to bypass certain procedures, the acceptability of which remains unclear;
- If CSIS, the primary security screening body, missed something, it is likely due to a heavy workload and limited resources (potentially influenced by the government’s target of 500,000 newcomers);
- Screeners may not have sufficient time to thoroughly search all databases, including the dark web, to make informed decisions. Given ISIS’s use of propaganda videos, it is doubtful that this particular film would not have been widely available to those involved in security matters.
Regarding the implications of the Eldidi case, there are significant concerns. The intelligence on the father-son duo likely originated from an allied service, possibly the French. This raises doubts within the intelligence community about Canada’s commitment to national security. The thought of a newly naturalized citizen like Ahmed Eldidi potentially crossing into the US to carry out his plans is alarming. Relying heavily on international partners’ goodwill is not a sustainable approach.
Must we wait for a tragedy before taking decisive action?
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Please provide a sentence or passage for me to rewrite.
Source link