‘Indigenous Land Acknowledgments’ Could Have Unintended Effects

Commentary

There has been a growing trend in certain parts of the United States and Canada over the past few years, where a ritual known as “land acknowledgment” has become popular. At city council meetings, board of supervisor’s meetings, and even some school board meetings in California (and possibly in other states), it is common to hear a recitation of a land acknowledgment by one or all of the board members before the pledge of allegiance to the U.S. flag.

These acknowledgments recognize the Indigenous people as the original stewards of the land. For example, at a city council meeting in Rohnert Park, California, one of the board members stated, “The City of Rohnert Park acknowledges that the Indigenous people are the original stewards of the land. Let it be acknowledged that this city of Rohnert Park is located upon the traditional homelands of the Federation of the Graton Rancheria, consisting of the Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo people.”

This practice has extended to other groups, organizations, schools, and universities. It is not uncommon to hear a land acknowledgment at various events like soccer games, performing arts productions, or corporate conferences.

While the intentions behind these acknowledgments may be good, questions arise about the validity and purpose of such statements. With Native American tribes historically being nomadic and the complexities of tribal territories, it is challenging to determine the “original stewards” of the land.

The concept of land acknowledgments is often linked to critical race theory (CRT), a Marxist-derived ideology aimed at creating divisions based on race. CRT, which is taught in many schools, universities, and organizations, seeks to highlight racial disparities and promote social change.

However, the practical implications of these acknowledgments raise legal and logistical issues. A city, county, or state may not have the authority to grant sovereignty or reparations to Native American tribes, as such decisions fall under the purview of Congress. The U.S. Constitution already recognizes the sovereignty of Native American tribes, and any actions towards empowerment or reparations must be done through proper legislative channels.

It is essential for leaders and officials to consider the implications of their land acknowledgments and whether they could inadvertently lead to conflicts or legal challenges. Ceasing these acknowledgments may be a prudent step to avoid unforeseen consequences.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.