The head of the Independent Association of Prep Schools has expressed concerns about the introduction of VAT on private school fees mid-way through the academic year. Dominic Norrish, Chief Director of the IAPS, stated that this move is “deliberately destructive” and goes against the government’s efforts to enhance education for all children.
Norrish mentioned that implementing this policy in January will create administrative and budgetary challenges for schools, leading parents to seek state placements for their children and potentially causing the closure of smaller, less affluent independent schools. He urged Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson to allow for consultation with the sector and consider a more thought-out timeline for introducing VAT.
The Labour party had promised to end tax exemptions for private schools during the election campaign, redirecting the funds to improve the public education system. Starting from January 2025, a standard 20 percent VAT will be added to independent schools’ tuition and boarding fees, with charities losing charitable business rates relief from April 2025.
Educators had anticipated these changes to take effect at the beginning of a new school year in September 2025. However, the sudden announcement in July of a January implementation deadline has raised concerns about the disruptive impact of such a swift transition.
Norrish highlighted the significant administrative burden this mid-year change would impose on schools, most of which are not equipped to handle VAT-related tasks. He noted that while some parents may afford the fee increases, the majority will struggle, leading to the possibility of children being withdrawn from independent schools.
The IAPS chief director warned that some schools have already decided to close due to the impending changes. He criticized the government’s choice of an arbitrary date for introducing VAT and predicted a surge in student transfers to the state sector.
Norrish emphasized that the rushed implementation of this policy will have adverse effects on schools and students, contrary to its intended goals. He expressed concerns about disruptions in learning, school closures, and increased financial burdens on the public sector.
The article also mentioned criticism from other education figures, including concerns about the financial strain on smaller independent schools and parents’ ability to afford the fee hikes. The government, however, defended its decision as necessary to improve standards in state schools.
Despite the government’s reassurances that the impact on the state school sector would be minimal, critics remain skeptical about the potential repercussions of introducing VAT on private school fees. The post highlighted research indicating an abundance of available state school places to accommodate potential transfers from private schools. Please rephrase that.
Source link
