A Philadelphia judge ruled that District Attorney Larry Krasner did not have enough evidence to prove that Elon Musk’s $1 million voter sweepstakes was illegal under Pennsylvania law. The judge stated that Krasner’s claims that the program, funded by America PAC with backing from Musk, constituted an illegal lottery were unfounded. The sweepstakes targeted swing state voters who supported free speech and the right to bear arms.
The judge explained that Krasner failed to prove the three elements required to establish a “lottery” under Pennsylvania law: prize, chance, and consideration. Musk’s attorneys argued that the sweepstakes was a contractual arrangement, with winners being chosen as paid spokespeople for America PAC. The $1 million prize was seen as compensation for services rendered, not as winnings from a game of chance.
Additionally, the judge noted that Krasner’s request for a preliminary injunction lacked urgency and necessity. He dismissed Krasner’s claims that the giveaway deceived participants and emphasized that the court would not issue unnecessary orders. The judge’s decision allowed the sweepstakes to continue operating through Election Day.
After the election, Musk pledged to continue supporting GOP candidates through America PAC. He has contributed millions of dollars to the PAC in support of pro-Constitution political leaders. Musk was not present at the court hearings regarding the sweepstakes.
In a filing with the Federal Election Commission, it was revealed that Musk had contributed approximately $118.5 million to America PAC between July and October. The judge’s ruling effectively allowed the $1 million giveaway to proceed as planned. Could you please rewrite this for me?
Source link
