The problematic CFMEU has sparked calls for a Royal Commission to conduct an unbiased investigation into its activities.
Labor’s National Executive is slated to decide on whether to continue accepting donations from the CFMEU, amidst industry stakeholders urging for a Royal Commission probe into the unions. Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke has indicated that firm action will be taken during the Executive meeting on July 18, with several state branches already severing financial ties.
Labor Minister Bill Shorten, speaking on ABC’s 7.30 program, anticipates a freeze on CFMEU donations until the issues are resolved, following a series of troubling allegations. These allegations include corruption charges against union leader Darren Greenfield and his son Michael, John Setka’s resignation after a dispute with the AFL, and accusations of ties to organized crime.
Labor placed the CFMEU under administration on July 17, appointing Fair Work Commission General Manager Murray Furlong as the administrator. Minister Burke emphasized the union’s duty to its members and condemned the reported behavior of the CFMEU’s construction division as a violation of this obligation.
Critics have questioned the effectiveness of Labor’s tough stance on the union, with the Australian Institute for Progress (AIP) labeling it as “window dressing” due to the party’s deep union connections. The AIP called for a bipartisan Royal Commission specifically focusing on the CFMEU to investigate its government ties and activities.
ACTU Secretary Sally McManus stated that the process of cleaning up the CFMEU could be a lengthy endeavor, involving the appointment of an administrator, new elections, and new leadership. She emphasized the importance of ensuring democratic processes within unions and removing any criminal elements before reinstating the CFMEU’s construction division.
The ACTU moved to suspend the CFMEU’s construction division on July 16 until it has been rid of criminal influences. The cleanup process within the union is expected to take time and require thorough scrutiny to ensure a transparent and accountable leadership.
Source link
