A ruling by a Mississippi district judge has determined that the federal government cannot enforce its reinterpretation of Title IX protections to include gender identity revisions.
Plaintiffs in up to 15 states, including Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, and Mississippi, filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Mississippi.
âThe Complaint alleges that HHSâs May 2024 Rule would require Plaintiffs to âuse taxpayer funds to pay for unproven and costly gender-transition interventions through Medicaid and state health plansâeven for children who may suffer irreversible harms,ââ Judge Gurioloa wrote.
Final Rule
In a May press release, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said the Final Ruleâs intent is to âstrengthen protectionsâ and ensure âequal access to this nationâs health care system and its social service programs for people with disabilities and their families.â
Related Stories
âIt is comprehensive in scope, advancing justice for people with disabilities and helping to ensure they are not discriminated against under any program or activity receiving funding from HHS just because they have a disability,â Mr. Becerra said.
HHS said its regulations were updated to prevent âdehumanizing beliefsâ surrounding medical treatments and conditions such as gender dysphoria.
âIncur Substantial Costsâ
In 2022, HHS issued a warning that any attempt to prevent a child from getting medical treatment for gender dysphoria violates several federal civil rights laws, including Section 1557 of the ACA.
âSection 1557 protects the right of individuals to access the health programs and activities of recipients of federal financial assistance without facing discrimination on the basis of sex, which includes discrimination on the basis of gender identity,â HHS stated. âCategorically refusing to provide treatment to an individual based on their gender identity is prohibited discrimination.â
Judge Gurioloa said the plaintiffs have proven that they would âincur substantial costsâ if they didnât comply with the Final Rule by losing federal funding, which was the deciding factor in his order.
âAs a result, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have established all four elements for imposing a preliminary injunction and stay,â he wrote.
âThis ruling is not only morally wrong, itâs also bad policy,â HRC Director Kelly Robinson said. âEveryone deserves access to the medical care they need to be healthy and thrive.â
âThis isnât over,â she added. âAll LGBTQ+ people should receive the health care they deserve and be able to make informed decisions about our own bodies.â
The Epoch Times contacted HHS for comment.
Please rewrite this sentence.
Source link
