Newton said, as the intention behind it is to target criminals who use masks to conceal their identity while committing crimes, not those who wear masks for legitimate reasons like COVID precautions or job requirements. The bill aims to address the concerns of law enforcement and businesses regarding the increase in criminal activities involving masked individuals.
The proposed legislation, titled âUnmasking Mobs and Criminals,â removes an exemption that allowed mask-wearing for COVID-19 prevention. Sen. Newton clarified that exceptions still exist for activities like performing arts, Halloween, and Mardi Gras masks, as the main focus is on individuals trying to hide their identity during criminal acts.
Despite the bill’s purpose being to combat crime, there has been pushback labeling it as anti-mask legislation. Democrat state Sen. Sydney Batch expressed concerns about the removal of the COVID exemption, emphasizing the need to protect immunocompromised individuals while acknowledging the necessity for law enforcement support.
Sen. Batch also highlighted potential impacts on the black community if the legislation is passed. She emphasized the importance of considering the diverse reasons people may wear masks and how certain communities might be disproportionately affected by the bill’s enforcement.
Furthermore, the bill addresses concerns about organizations like Antifa and recent protesters using masks to conceal their identities while engaging in criminal activities. Sen. Newton stressed the importance of unmasking individuals involved in criminal behavior, regardless of their affiliations.
Despite criticism and misinformation surrounding the legislation, Republican state Rep. Ken Fontenot defended it as a necessary measure to target criminals using masks for unlawful purposes. He emphasized that the law specifically applies to individuals wearing masks while committing crimes and does not restrict legitimate mask-wearing practices.
In conclusion, the bill’s proponents argue that it is designed to enhance public safety by addressing the misuse of masks by criminals, rather than restricting individuals from wearing masks for legitimate reasons. The debate surrounding the legislation underscores the complex balance between public health concerns and law enforcement priorities.
Newton expressed his regret over the fear that many people have been led to believe that wearing a mask for health reasons could be considered criminal. He stated, âI find it regrettable that so many people have been frightened into thinking that their mask-wearing for health reasons is somehow going to be criminalized.â
