Celebrating resistance against tyranny and oppression in China, the United States, and around the world is always justified and well-deserved. “But they are advocates of peace.”
“At the rally, she highlighted the oppressive influence of the CCP, which is only 75 years old,” she stated.
Her husband, Fred Newcomb, a respected investment banker and honorary chairman of the World Human Accountability Organization at the United Nations, shared her views.
In a speech, he emphasized the importance of standing against tyranny and oppression, regardless of the country.
He stated, “The fight against tyranny and oppression is always justified and commendable, whether it is in China, the United States, or any other part of the world.”
He expressed that their actions align with the values of America, a nation built by those who fought for freedom.
“I am a citizen of a country that extends its support to other nations, risking the lives of our soldiers for their freedom and ours,” he told The Epoch Times. “I am deeply passionate about this cause.”
Gong Kai, who survived the One Child Policy as a third child, credited Falun Gong practitioners for developing Freegate, a tool that allowed Chinese people to bypass internet censorship. This exposure to the free world opened his eyes after living in a controlled environment for 20 years.
Cai Yuanxing, a retired public servant and former Party member, publicly renounced his 21-year membership in a prepared speech.
He stated, “I want to play a role in toppling the CCP,” citing the Chinese proverb, “everyone gives a shove to a falling wall.”
Xi Jinping, the communist leader, acknowledged the decline of the Communist Party and the urgency to break the cycle of history.
He noted the party’s weakness and impending downfall, describing it as being on its last legs.
The article includes images of Falun Gong practitioners participating in a rally to end the persecution of their faith in China, showcasing their peaceful advocacy efforts. Please rewrite the following sentence to make it clearer: “The presentation was not comprehensible due to the excessive use of technical jargon.”
“The presentation was difficult to understand because it used too much technical language.”
Source link
