Supreme Court Denies Bid to Expand No-Excuse Mail-In Ballots In Texas

The decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to not hear the appeal regarding the Texas law requiring voters under 65 to provide justification for mail-in voting means that the law remains in effect. This is seen as a victory for advocates of election integrity. The law, which only allows those 65 and older to vote by mail without an excuse, has faced legal challenges from Democrat-aligned groups seeking to expand mail-in voting. The refusal by the Supreme Court to take up the case is seen as a win for those who argue that no-excuse mail-in voting can lead to fraud and compromise election security. On the other hand, it is a setback for those who view such laws as voter suppression. The decision also has implications for other states with similar age-based restrictions on mail-in voting. Newt Gingrich mentioned in a February interview on Fox News that in order for Republicans to secure a win this year, they would need to outvote Democrats by approximately 5 percent to prevent any potential election theft. The former speaker also emphasized the importance of implementing various reforms to ensure voter integrity in the upcoming 2024 election. These reforms include outlawing ranked choice voting and non-citizen voting, consolidating election dates, mandating voter ID, and protecting vulnerable mail ballots. Another election integrity monitor has outlined these critical reforms as essential steps for securing the integrity of future elections. Read more about these proposed reforms here.

Source link