Snyder’s case involves “classic bribery” where he received payments in exchange for official conduct, she argued.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case could have significant implications for how public corruption cases are prosecuted in the future.
Snyder’s case is being compared to a police chief demanding money after preventing a burglary or a safety inspector asking for payment for permitting a dangerous enterprise, according to the lawyer. Justice Elena Kagan pointed out that the law applies not only to government officials but also to other important institutions in America. She questioned whether a hospital could face legal trouble for giving special treatment to a billionaire in hopes of receiving a large donation. The lawyer mentioned that the government would not pursue questionable cases, but Chief Justice John Roberts expressed skepticism. Justice Clarence Thomas was absent from the hearing, with Chief Justice Roberts stating that Thomas would still participate by reading the transcripts and briefs. The Supreme Court is expected to make a ruling on the case, known as Snyder v. United States, by the end of June.
Source link
