Supreme Court Rejects Musk’s Case Against Jack Smith Over Trump’s Twitter Records

The decision of the high court on Monday was made without any comments, and there were no dissents recorded. The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a challenge brought by Elon Musk’s X platform regarding the release of data from former President Donald Trump’s Twitter account to special counsel Jack Smith. In 2023, Smith obtained a warrant for Trump’s account as part of the federal prosecutors’ case related to the 2020 election. The court’s decision was delivered on Monday without any comments or dissents noted. Initially, the Musk-owned platform refused to comply with a nondisclosure order and was fined $350,000 in August 2023. Smith’s team highlighted Trump’s Twitter posts in the first indictment and subsequently brought a revised indictment against him in September. Prosecutors secured a search warrant in January 2023, directing Twitter to provide information on Trump’s account. The government also obtained a nondisclosure agreement to keep the search warrant confidential. X argued before the Supreme Court in May that Smith’s team circumvented executive privilege by obtaining the nondisclosure order. X emphasized the significance of upholding the First Amendment in its petition to the Supreme Court. Smith’s lawyers dismissed X’s arguments and stated that the platform cannot claim privilege over the records in question. The government contended that X had no justification for refusing to comply with the special counsel’s warrant. Smith filed a brief last week with evidence alleging that Trump committed crimes and attempted to overturn the 2020 election illegally. The Supreme Court resumed its sessions on Monday after the summer break and is scheduled to hear major cases until around June 2025. Can you please rewrite this sentence?

Source link