Richard Glossip claims that his 1998 murder conviction was based on evidence that his lawyers never got to see. The Oklahoma appeals court has determined that he has exhausted all of his appeals. However, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear his case on October 9th. Glossip has been on death row since 1998 for allegedly hiring someone to commit the murder of their employer.
Glossip will be asking the Supreme Court to order a new murder trial, which the Oklahoma Attorney General believes he deserves. Despite the Court of Criminal Appeals stating that Glossip has used up all legal options under Oklahoma law, his case has garnered national attention. The Attorney General has publicly opposed Glossip’s execution.
Glossip’s defense lawyer argues that crucial evidence was withheld by the state, which could have impacted the case. The defense team claims that prosecutors failed to disclose information about the mental health of the key witness against Glossip. The Van Treese family, however, argues that the evidence was already known to Glossip’s defense team.
Despite multiple trials and appeals, Glossip’s conviction has stood. The case has raised questions about the legality and fairness of the death penalty in Oklahoma. Glossip’s supporters believe that he has not received a fair trial and that there are serious doubts about his guilt.
After receiving several reprieves, Glossip was granted another one as new witnesses came forward with claims that he was not involved in the murder or with allegations of misconduct by law enforcement and prosecutors.
During a hearing with the Pardon and Parole Board, Drummond expressed concerns about the numerous unanswered questions surrounding Glossip’s case, stating that there was not enough evidence to justify the death penalty.
Drummond emphasized the importance of ensuring that justice is served and stated his belief that Glossip may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
As Knight prepares to bring Glossip’s case to the Supreme Court, he commends Drummond for his bravery in acknowledging potential errors and for helping give Glossip a chance at a new trial.
Knight noted that it is rare for a government official to admit mistakes, highlighting Drummond’s courage in advocating for justice.