Commentary
Unicorns are a myth.
There is no concrete evidence to prove their existence, which is not the same as proving they do not exist. As astronomer Carl Sagan famously said, “Absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence.”
However, Sagan also emphasized that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” echoing a sentiment expressed by French mathematician and scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace in the 19th century: “The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness.”
While you are entitled to believe in unicorns, it is essential to provide compelling evidence to support such a claim.
Related Stories
The assertion that sex and gender are not strictly binary, coupled with the concept of transitioning between genders, are significant claims that demand substantial evidence to support medical practices like puberty blockers and hormone therapy.
According to Dr. Guyatt’s research:
“There is a substantial lack of certainty regarding the effects of puberty blockers on individuals with gender dysphoria. More rigorous studies are necessary to ascertain the outcomes of this intervention.”
Similarly, their study on cross-gender hormones concludes:
“There is considerable uncertainty surrounding the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy, and we cannot definitively determine if it is beneficial or harmful. High-quality studies are essential to establish stronger evidence.”
Dr. Guyatt emphasizes the importance of transparently communicating the uncertainty surrounding these treatments to patients and caregivers, considering the lack of robust evidence and the individual values and preferences involved in decision-making.
This should serve as a cautionary signal to Canadian healthcare providers involved in gender-related care, urging them to reevaluate their approach in light of existing uncertainties.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Please rewrite this sentence.
Source link
