The Supreme Court’s decision in the Schechter case in 1935 challenged the New Deal legislation and led to a major backlash from the Roosevelt administration. This clash between branches of government highlighted the delicate balance of power in the constitutional system. More recently, the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Chevron deference rule has had a significant impact on the authority of executive agencies. This decision has sparked a wave of litigation and raised questions about the regulatory power of these agencies. The Trump administration’s efforts to increase presidential authority over agencies also played a role in shaping these developments. As the Biden administration considers new measures to limit the court’s power, the constitutional principle of checks and balances remains a key issue at the heart of this ongoing debate. If these actions lead to a significant reform that limits their influence and power, it can greatly disrupt the constitutional structure and the rule of law itself.
To truly grasp the current issues in American political life, one must look beyond the surface and delve into topics such as Chevron, Schedule F, and Project 2025, which all touch on the power and authority of executive agencies.
In my years in ideological and intellectual circles, I have never witnessed the level of awareness surrounding agency power that exists today. The lockdowns, press censorship, and partisan use of agency resources have highlighted the overreach of these agencies, which exceed the powers granted by the U.S. Constitution.
Efforts to curb this excessive power are gaining momentum, prompting a defensive response to protect administrative agency power and the political independence of the federal civil service.
Beyond the headlines, the central issue currently affecting American politics revolves around the question of control. Some believe that power should rest with the people through their elected representatives, a viewpoint supported by the Supreme Court. This stance has put the Court in a contentious position.
Please note that the views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily align with those of The Epoch Times.
Source link
