A spokesperson from the think tank stated to The Epoch Times that they do not represent any candidate or campaign. Several allies of Trump have distanced themselves from the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, emphasizing that they do not endorse any specific candidate. Senator Marco Rubio, who has been speculated as a potential vice presidential candidate for Trump, clarified during a CNN interview that their candidate for president is Donald Trump, not anyone affiliated with the think tank. He addressed comments made by the head of Project 2025, Kevin Roberts, stating that their focus is on supporting Donald Trump as the presidential candidate.
Stephen Miller, a former Trump adviser expected to serve in a second Trump administration, also denied any involvement with Project 2025 and dismissed claims suggesting otherwise on social media. A Project 2025 spokesperson reiterated that they do not endorse any presidential candidate, including Trump, and are a coalition of conservative groups advocating policy recommendations for the next conservative president. The spokesperson emphasized that it is up to the president, likely Trump, to decide which recommendations to implement.
Mr. Roberts defended his stance on a revolution to reclaim power from elites and bureaucrats, attributing political violence to the left. Trump himself distanced himself from Project 2025 in a statement on Truth Social, asserting he has no involvement or knowledge of the initiative. Despite this, top Democrats and the Biden campaign have linked the former president to the project in ads and on social media.
Project 2025 proposes significant reforms to the federal government, including streamlining federal agencies, with contributions from individuals who worked in the Trump administration. Russ Vought, a former director of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump, authored a chapter for the project. The initiative involves collaboration between the Heritage Foundation and other like-minded groups to develop a comprehensive plan for the future. Can you rewrite this sentence?
Source link
