Trump promises free IVF and more lenient abortion laws: Former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, has taken a moderate stance on abortion, causing backlash from the pro-life faction of his party. “I think the six-week ban is too short, it has to be more time,” he stated in reference to Florida’s restrictive abortion policy. Trump also pledged to cover all costs associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment and allow new parents to deduct major newborn expenses from their taxes. Critics argue that government funding for IVF treatments would increase costs and that it’s not the government’s role to pay for such procedures.
Trump’s shift towards more lenient abortion laws and promises of free IVF treatments appear to be aimed at attracting swing state women voters. However, critics argue that providing free services is not a sustainable solution and that government intervention may have unintended consequences. To truly support families, government policies should focus on removing barriers to affordable housing and childcare, rather than promising free services that may not be financially feasible.
On the other side, Democratic nominee Kamala Harris recently gave her first major interview, where she attempted to position herself as a champion of President Joe Biden’s policies while also promising change. Critics argue that her answers were vague and lacked specific details on her plans for Day One in office. Running mate Tim Walz mostly remained silent during the interview, drawing attention to his previous exaggerations about his military service.
Her response regarding fracking was lacking, highlighting her tendency to struggle when questioned about changing positions on important issues. She stood by “Bidenomics” and attributed economic instability and high inflation to the challenges inherited from the Trump administration, rather than excessive government spending. It is commendable that Harris has shifted focus away from identity politics, emphasizing her belief that she is the most qualified candidate for the job regardless of race or gender. During an unscripted interview, Harris managed to navigate the discussion without major missteps, although she did not offer any particularly insightful or profound insights. The interviewer could have pressed harder on both Harris and Walz for their evolving stances and narratives.
The article also includes a segment on Janet Fash, a dedicated Rockaway lifeguard who has been ensuring beach safety since 1988 and is known for her outspoken criticism of the union.
Additionally, the article concludes with a “Quick Hits” section.
Source link
