The trial of Liz Gunn continues in courtroom 7, with charges that seem unsupported by evidence and a prosecutor who refuses to give his name to the media.
In 2022, hundreds of protesters gathered in front of New Zealand’s Parliament to protest COVID-19 mandates and lockdowns, claiming that the state was conspiring against its citizens. The trial of Liz Gunn, a former TV host and leader of the NZ Loyal Party, along with Jonathan Clark, sheds light on the state’s use of power to stifle critics.
Gunn and Clark were arrested for filming at an airport terminal without permission, where they hoped to interview an unvaccinated family. The charges against them include assault, resisting police, and trespassing. However, the weakness of the prosecution’s case became apparent during the trial.
The most serious charge of assault was based on CCTV footage showing Gunn placing her hand on an airport security official’s arm, causing minimal pain. The police evidence did little to support the charges, with constables describing the defendants as “aggressive” or “argumentative.”
Gunn’s behavior during the trial was also scrutinized, with her tendency to make irrelevant speeches in the witness box. Outside the court, the police lawyer refused to give his first name, adding to the peculiarities of the case.
The trial is set to resume on May 10, with the verdict expected to be delivered at a later date. Please rephrase this sentence.
Source link
