Former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy recently sparked discussion by proposing a “libertarian-nationalist alliance.” This idea is not new and has been advocated by some as a way to align libertarian and nationalist values. However, the compatibility of nationalism with libertarianism and liberal values is questionable. Nationalism, with its focus on collectivism, ethnic identity, and government control, conflicts with the core principles of liberty, free markets, and universal human rights.
In a detailed analysis published in National Affairs, Cato Institute scholar Alex Nowrasteh and others argue against the case for nationalism. They highlight the dangers of nationalism in a diverse nation like the United States, emphasizing its potential to fuel conflict, promote discrimination, and undermine democratic institutions. Nationalism, they argue, is akin to socialism in its tendencies towards government intervention and poses a threat to individual freedoms.
Furthermore, the idea of a libertarian-nationalist alliance is critiqued by Eric Boehm of Reason. He points out the fundamental differences between libertarianism’s emphasis on individual choice and nationalism’s focus on state power and collective identity. The current wave of nationalism in American politics is characterized by a desire to expand government control and pursue protectionist policies, which are at odds with libertarian principles.
While there may be instances where libertarian and nationalist views align on specific issues, the overarching ideologies remain incompatible. The advocacy for limited government and individual liberty by libertarians contrasts with the statist and culturally-driven agenda of nationalists. As such, a broad alliance between the two groups is unlikely to be feasible.
Ultimately, the debate over a libertarian-nationalist alliance underscores the deep ideological divisions within contemporary politics. While alliances between diverse groups have been forged in history, the core differences between libertarianism and nationalism present significant obstacles to any meaningful collaboration.
