Both supporters of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have made the argument that voting for them is not about their proposed policies, but about what they wouldn’t do if elected.
For instance, Trump has called for a 20 percent tariff on goods entering the US, but some of his business supporters believe he won’t actually enact it.
While some dismiss Trump’s bluster as a negotiating tactic, others see it as a potential threat to international trade.
Similarly, Harris’ proposed ban on “price gouging” has been portrayed as a modest expansion of existing laws, despite initial concerns about federal price controls.
The lack of clarity on both candidates’ economic policies raises doubts about their seriousness and ability to govern effectively.
As America faces economic challenges, it is crucial to have leaders with coherent and consistent ideas for governance, which seems lacking in the current political landscape.
